The Month that was Espana's

The World Cup in South Africa has now come and gone with the Spanish armada being crowned World Cup Champions. After a month long spectacle that saw Europe descend and then resurrect into the new football--um soccer, power the Oranje of the Dutch can only reminisce at what could of been after a hard fought, often literally, 1-0 World Cup Final Match.

Sports it seems has taken center stage of late, to the delight of BP (BP) which has seen it's stock drop 40% in the last three months as the Oil Spill, caused by the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig in the Gulf of Mexico continues to rage on. A $20 Billion expense net already set up by the company for damages and clean up, is a big chuck of change, even to big oil! But the biggest news coming to the state of Florida may not be the drifting oil slick but LeBron James.

The biggest name in Basketball decided to take his talents from Cleveland to Miami to play for the Heat franchise with fellow free-agents Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade. A move that makes Miami the center of the basketball universe and puts the triumvirate within earshot of a sports dynasty.

But this time of year isn't just for Soccer tournaments and sports free agency, with the June quarter ending, earnings announcements will be gearing into full swing, especially in the technology space, with some of the biggest names like Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Intel (INTC) and Apple (AAPL) expected this week and next.

With the economy and employment picture still at the forefront of a shaky market, there's a lot of questions about where the earning's growth will come from. Microsoft and Intel are set to benefit from a upgrade cycle of computers and software in the corporate space, especially the software giant from Seattle as it bangs the Windows 7 drum, to distance further and further from the previous and ultimately drastic under-achiever that was Windows Vista. Where as Google and Apple are capturing the mind-space of the consumer with highly successful smart-phone platforms Android and iOS respectively.

Apple's iPhone 4 launch was the most successful yet, selling 1.7 Million units in the first 3 days and adding to that 3 Million iPad tablets sold, in just under 3 months, and Apple investors continue to move towards higher and higher expectations. While Google's Android software is being pushed hard by phone carriers around the world, Google by giving its software away for free isn't exactly lining its pockets. What the company is banking on, is the ubiquitous nature of its search brand and mobile applications. An Android world means Google at the front and center of that many more mobile screens and quests for information.

The start of this summer and past the holiday weekends in North America have been dominated by the Sports pages, but now as the stadium lights dim on South Africa and the LeBron nuptials are signed, the focus shifts back to the markets and a slew of earnings releases and conference call transcripts to pour over and discover the next investment opportunity.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL, GOOG

Google Shows Off Chrome OS in Technical Preview

Google's (GOOG) entry into the Operating System space is at least a year away, but the Internet and Search behemoth showed off a technical preview of what they've been tinkering with to an audience of journalists and "techies".

Expanding on the browser that Google released called Chrome, and its currently advertised 40Million user install base, the operating system advanced by Google is a means to the future of cloud computing. All applications on Chrome OS will be web apps and all data is in sync with the cloud at all times. Basically a user would be able to log into any Chrome OS computer and treat it like your own. The Browser is the key.

Major targets for Google with this system are speed and security. With all major components of the OS, either incredibly lightweight or in the cloud, the time to get a computer up and running will be drastically reduced. The demo netbook that Google showed off was ready to go in 7 seconds. The security model Google is working on with Chrome OS is also designed for the Internet age. Building specific locks to the core of the system from applications will allow Chrome to remain unharmed by viral and malicious programs. The Internet connected self-update and synchronization system will essentially allow Chrome users to always have the most current and safest version of the operation system. If something does go wrong, Chrome can re-install a clean version right on the spot and re-sync all the user's data, almost transparently. Some advanced thinking from a company with a lot of advanced thinkers.

But, how will it all work, what about the powerful desktop applications the computing public has grown accustomed to? Well, initially Chrome is situated for a secondary computer, Internet connected for on the go work, like the netbooks and smart-phones of today. As users get more accustomed to living in the "cloud", it is Google's hope that Chrome can grow into larger and more advanced hardware. Internet technologies have also come a long way in the last couple of years, allowing for far richer web applications than in years past. That alone makes the web app only Chrome a solution to think about, as increasingly more work, social and play is done online.

So, what's in it for Google, and more specifically Google's investors? Well, the long-term battle on several fronts between Google and Microsoft (MSFT) just got a lot more interesting with today's demonstration. Netbooks are the fastest growing computer segment, according to several analyst and consumer measurement reports, and it is a field now dominated by Microsoft, first with Windows XP, and now, or so the hope is, Windows 7. Since Chrome OS is open-source and will be free to manufactures, the Zero price point will put a lot of pressure on the folks from Seattle. But to Google, this is the start of a next generation of cloud-only computing users, a part of the business, where from an infrastructure stand-point Google is dominant. The company can afford to guide development here making nothing from it, but enabling a generation of faster, and more secure web surfers, who'll in turn be more trusting of the cloud, and in turn more receptive to tailored Google advertisements .

There's that buzzword again, the cloud. Google, like other giants in the tech space, want to be the big fish in the cloud business. There are other companies that would focus on the corporate market first and get tangible business that way. A lucrative business that will be as well, but Amazon (AMZN), IBM (IBM), Microsoft and HP (HPQ) are all in competition to provide the infrastructure and cloud services for business. Google's reach has always been about advertising to the consumer, and by providing products and services for free, it's building a trust with the consumer that companies rarely have an opportunity to experience. Granted, user data in the cloud brings up many privacy concerns, but Google seems to be able to side-step its way around most issues in that realm, all the while gathering more tailored information about the surfing and shopping habits of its users.

Google's mantra is clearly changing, of course they are still behind the well publicized "Don't Be Evil" but in the new age of computing and business, Google's really striving to serve up "The Perfect Ad". Because the most lucrative ad, is the one that's as tailored as it can possibly be, because it gives the highest potential of a sale, and after all its the sale that drives business. Chrome OS is the next step towards that potential sale.

Disclosure: Author owns GOOG

End of July Market Musings & Microhoo deal

As another month comes to a close, the market's resistance proof rally continues on the strength of strong earnings and more signs of a waning recession. GDP numbers out for the previous quarter showed a decline of 1% in American GDP, this was better than the expected 1.5% decline, which showed economists that slowly but surely the United States is making its way out of the recession.

But the markets knew that in March right?! As the S%P continues to fly from March lows of near 650 to to cusp of 1000 yesterday. Just about a 50% rise for the broad market indicator. The real driver of this continuing rally is the strength in Corporate Earnings this quarterly season, which will be a difficult act to follow for the remainder of the summer as those results fade and current unemployment rears its head again. However, companies now have learned, adapted and retooled their operations and streamlined their businesses during the economic bottom (1st quarter of this year) and are now awaiting the increases in demand that are expected to come in the 2nd half of this calendar year.

On the deal front in recent news, was the Internet Search deal between Microsoft (MSFT) and Yahoo (YHOO). By combining search operations to Microsoft and sales operations to Yahoo the companies hope to put a dent into market leader Google (GOOG). However, the deal has widely been panned for Yahoo, with Investors sending shares down heavily in the few days after the deal was officially announced. The partnership is a revenue sharing one with no payments made upfront and is a far cry from the $40Billion buyout offer Microsoft initiated, nor is it even close to the $1Billion Microsoft most recently offered in cash along with Billions more in stock purchases.

The news media certainly has the right grasp, as the deal, which Yahoo had always held the upper hand on, has gone completely to Microsoft. Yahoo essentially gave away 20% Market Share in search, for cost savings and the chance to deal with all the sales hassles related to Search Advertising between both companies. Microsoft will now control about 28% of search queries through its new Search Engine but it still has a ways to go to get to the monetization levels Google has spent the last few years achieving. And that doesn't even begin to mention the complexities in integration relating to the now-coined "Microhoo" partnership. Executives at both companies expect this to take 2 years to get through fully. That's about half a lifetime on the Internet I'm afraid, so while Google will wave its hands and put pressure on both companies to drag out the legal battles, secretly they've got to be happy, as 2 years of distractions await their newest competitor, now with 8.5% market share, Bing!

Disclosure: Author owns GOOG

Google's Vision of Life to be Subsidized by Advertisers

The techno-worlds of open-source and standards-compliance are united in celebration on the heels of Google's (GOOG) announcement of a new and upcoming platform called Chrome OS. A new giant has awaken to try and breach the Windows stranglehold of the modern world. Free and widely available Linux couldn't do it, the fawned-over and renowned Mac OS X still can't do it, but perhaps the quirky little giant that is Google can lead a way towards universal, free and open salvation.

Google's announcement that it is in fact working on a full fledged Personal Computer Operating System shouldn't really come as a surprise given that over the past year and a half it has launched the Android OS for Mobile Devices and Chrome, the first browser to have individual process management, a staple of every flavor of operating system in the modern computing world. Rumors of Google's OS work span back years in the blogosphere, but nothing was concrete until today's unveiling of Chrome OS, an operating system to run on full household computers based on Google technology and an open source Linux under-pinning.

By marketing this move into Operating System territory on the back of its growing Chrome browser user-base, Google is squarely taking a web-centric view of the computing world. Coincidentally, after years of perpetual beta, Google removed the beta label off of several products in its Apps suite, charting a path towards an enterprise serious attitude that the company has of yet never employed. First Google Apps gets a fresh coat of grown-up paint and now Google eyes the netbook market as the first for its full fledged operating system. Microsoft (MSFT) better not turn a blind eye to these threats like it has to others who have tried to vault into its dominant space.

After mostly shrugging off Apple's jabs at Windows Vista and watching itself slowly but surely lose some market share, it still took the worst worldwide recession in generations to get Microsoft's attention to start firing back at competitors. This is a company that cannot afford to rest on its laurels, nor one that can afford to blow dollar after dollar in a blinding struggle for relevance in markets that it is an also-ran in (i.e. Internet Search). Google's head on assault began years ago as it made the web (and inherently itself) the first destination for millions of computer users, then it got them hooked on a new way of looking at e-mail, then followed that with calendars and slowly simple documents and spreadsheets, all while being dismissed by market leaders as too simple or too weak for real use. Newsflash to those competitors: Majority of people only really need simple and weak, and powerful office suites and complex operating systems exist on most computers because there was no other choice!

The web browser is the portal to the new technology world and Google, Microsoft and Apple (AAPL) all know it, however Google's become the most nimble of the three at being able to adapt to it. Chrome was a starting point, and while getting 30 million users in 9 months is a good start, it is still just a tiny fraction of the web population, so Google's got a long way to go before it can claim the browser Chrome a success. Chrome OS on the other hand is a different animal, it'll be the only thing users need to get up and running on a new computer while having simple native tasks be quick and web tasks even quicker. As new web technologies evolve along with the growing presence of "offline" web apps, there was still always a need to have some distinction between the browser and the operation system. That line is blurring and perhaps Google's figured this out and may just have found a way to combine the two under Chrome's umbrella. Brilliant, if it were available today, but unfortunately for Google and its users the creation of a platform needs the help of several building partners, since no one buys an operating system off the shelf these days. Except of course for loyal Mac purists, which love having their Mac OS X be the latest and greatest, and given Apple's pricing commitment to the next version of OS X its a hard upgrade to pass up. Kudos to Apple for figuring out people can still want to buy software off the shelf.

$29 for a new version of an operating system, that's an incredible price from the folks at Cupertino, and something Microsoft's bean-counters certainly cannot match with Windows 7. However, someone can, and that someone is Google! Chrome OS, like the Chrome browser, is of course based on open-source software, and in and of itself will be open-source, just like Google's Android OS is for mobile phones. What that means is that Chrome OS will cost NOTHING to computer manufacturers who will shoe-horn it into the netbooks/laptops/desktops of the future. Tough to compete with free! Especially if its quality free from a source as reputable as Google.

But herein lies the rub, what's in it for Google? All these free services and platforms can't just be a secret desire to topple the greatest technology behemoth of all time, can it? Of course not, Google's clearest path to monetization is to get users onto the web as quickly, efficiently and distraction-free as possible, because it wants to be the one doing the distracting with advertisements of all shapes and sizes, from text ads in search, to display ads on the network, to video ads on youTube and everything else under the sun. How do you provide web users the easiest route to the web? Well build your own free multi-lane uber-autobahns with Android and now Chrome OS. The two pillars of the web of the future and Google will have troops at each one, mobile and home computing.

The more time users spend on the web, and the more tasks they begin shifting to the web, the better for Google and the more opportunities Google gets to serve up ads from its vast and numerically superior stable of advertisers. This is why Google is free, in its eyes Life should be subsidized by advertising, and advertising of the future will all become Internet based and completely traceable because it gives the advertiser complete metrics and Return-On-Investment calculations to the tiniest detail that are unmatched in any other ad-based marketplace. And as Televisions and Radios become Internet enabled in the future, bet Google will be right there with the expertise to build out a similar type of ad network. Google is more than willing to subsidize its own development costs if its able to produce a pathway to a Google-centric web that others wouldn't or couldn't replicate.

As encompassing as technology and the web already are in everyday life, we've yet to scratch even the earliest of limits, with every piece of new technology becoming web-enabled the inter-connections between people and their technology becomes further encompassing, with the cloud becoming a centralized hub forcing information separation to consist only of virtual borders. A prospect not completely sold to business just yet, but the power of the crowd, and the cost-effectiveness of the cloud will break down those barriers. How will all this happen, and who will pay for it? As Mark Cuban recently wrote about the prospects of free business, the biggest problem is the continued expectation of free and the inability of the biggest pushers of free-service to keep costs in check and monetization opportunities plentiful. That thesis is very much on the mark, no pun intended, by how it related to business, but what it misses, is the relationship of consumers as the end-goal for the real buyers of free: The advertisers.

The Internet, being the disruptive technological platform that it is, essentially drives costs of everything to near zero. This is due to the simple phenomenon that if everyone is connected to everything, there's always someone who'll do something for cheaper, until the cost of that something is driven close enough to zero to become minuscule. And the ones paying the bills at that point will rely on advertising for profitability, and the advertisers will rely on their ads working to then sell products and services and in turn pay their own bills. Google just happens to be the biggest entity making use of the free economy that is the Internet, using all of its advertisers to pay for its storage, bandwidth and corporate costs.

Advertising is funding an over-indulgence in all things web, but subsidizing life, that seems like a stretch right? Currently yes, but as the computer and the Internet is engulfed by all of the younger generations for communications, commerce, entertainment, social networking, dating & relationships and more, it will start to look startlingly close to the major components of life.

Imagine if the brick & mortar world worked this way? Say there was a Google that would pay for everyone's gasoline, provided they had a billion lane road to a super-shopping center, and drove a car they purchased but had customized by Google to point out interesting things along the road and showcase the occasional billboard tailored to an individual's needs and previous purchases. How many would turn that down? And after sometime of that model working, I'd say the brick & mortar Google would even be willing to take you to the lot and pay for the vehicle, guaranteeing it would always work perfectly on those roads to the mall. All subsidized of course by your friendly neighbourhood Spidermen, umm, I mean Mad Men.

Disclosure: Author owns GOOG, AAPL

Apple cuts Mac prices, unveils Software and new iPhone at WWDC

The yearly developer showcase that is Apple's (AAPL) Worldwide Developer Conference (WWDC) kicked off with a keynote, once again sans-Jobs, but was packed with several software and hardware announcements.

Consider Palm's (PALM) highly touted Pre smart phone sold well in its first weekend the landscape for telecom mind share had shifted away from Apple for at least a short while. Analysts early estimates point to sales of about 50,000 Pre devices in the first weekend for Palm, which compares to about 270,000 devices when the original iPhone went on sale and 1,000,000 units for the iPhone 3G. While it may be unfair to compare launches since Sprint is a much smaller carrier compared to AT&T, and the iPhone 3G launched in a multitude of countries, its the media that counts. Palm made a good sized dent during the Pre's announcement, sales will have to continue to deliver if it hopes to turn that dent into a crack.

But when Apple takes the stage for any event, competitors in each line of business must be anxcious, hoping to be able to breathe a sigh of relief as the rumors come and go with little to no surprises. At today's event, it seems every business Apple is in, it made headaches for its competitors.

The Computer Hardware business: Apple reduced pricing on virtually all of its machines, turning the well designed aluminum laptops into a family of MacBook Pro machines starting at $1199 for the 13 inch computer formally known as simply a MacBook. The slim MacBook Air also got a price cut and Apple kept the $999 price point on the previous generation white plastic MacBook. The only model in the line to keep only the MacBook name.

The Computer Software business: Mac OS X Snow Leopard, branded and versioned like a full OS upgrade, was priced like a going out of business sale. $29 for the next version of Apple's Operating System due in September, has got to make the folks at Microsoft (MSFT), who are rolling out Windows 7 a month later, a little bit edgy.

The Phone business: Apple, having repeatedly said, didn't want to leave a price umbrella for competitors has finally publicly brandished an iPhone on the world for $99. While unveiling a 'newer, better, faster, stronger' iPhone 3GS, sounds like a Porsche doesn't it, the company kept its $199/$299 pricing for the new models, setting the existing iPhone at the magic 99 figure. This puts tremendous pressure on the makers of Blackberries, and Androids, and especially the Pre, which is $199 after a $100 rebate.

Many hoped, Steve Jobs would make at least a minor show-stopping appearance, the rumor mill still has Apple's iconic CEO returning to work at the end of the month, which will put several analysts and many potential investors at ease. Apple's year-to-date run up of 69% has showed that Investors feel the company can survive without Steve or they are already sure he will return. However, the company still stands $60/share away from those gaudy 2007 highs, with a business models that combined are selling more devices than ever.

Disclosure: Author is long AAPL

Console Makers battle for fans taking over Gaming Expo

Video Games and Movies, the two business channels that were least hit by floundering worldwide economics. Box Office receipts and attendance are at or near records and the growth of gaming, while pausing slightly, still stands out as a tech sector on the rise. With gaming options like Nintendo's (NTDOY) Wii & DS, Apple's (AAPL) iPod Touch & iPhone, Microsoft's (MSFT) XBox and Sony's (SNE) Playstation 3 & PSP the kids (and ever increasing adults) these days have choices aplenty.

The Electronic Entertainment Expo goes on as we speak and it has been an interesting couple of days with keynote speeches by the big 3 console makers; Microsoft, Nintendo & Sony. While its been common knowledge that Nintendo and its motion controlled & causal gamer placed Wii has been the big winner in this generation of the console wars, with NDP data showing it outselling the XBox by 2:1 and the PS3 by a factor of 2.5:1 lately, the true test is likely to be longevity.

It's no surprise that laggards Microsoft and Sony had to deliver something to excite fans and developers in order to gain traction against Nintendo. It was the folks from Redmond up first yesterday with a keynote speech that excited not only the XBox faithful but fence-sitters alike.
Not only was the XBox opened up for several applications including social networks Twitter and Facebook and music streaming service Last.fm, it also introduced several enticing games and a entirely new control system.

It was the control system that garnered the heaviest reaction. "Project Natal", as it was coined, gives players a way to become the controller for their games. A camera system with facial and voice recognition follows a player's movements and can translate them onscreen for gaming interactions. The Microsoft team showed off several demos, straight out of Minority Report, of the "still-in-development" technology but it was very promising and it goes completely the other way from Nintendo's popular Wii motion controls. A development high-point for Microsoft in the gaming world? Or would Sony steal some thunder with their own announcements just a day later?

Sony's day had arrived and the company had several announcements to make, first a foremost another handheld system, dubbed the PSP Go. Sony will continue selling its existing PSP which has slowly but surely been selling very well for the company (although not as well as Nintendo's DS line or Apple's iPod Touch). With this new version Sony is going to full digital distribution for games and media making it a direct competitor to the aforementioned iPod. With 16GB of storage it undercuts the iPod's price by $50 ($249 vs $299).

Not to be outdone, Sony also jumped into the Motion Control business with a new controller. Internet outlets were quick to praise Sony's efforts as the motion control (based on a similar technology as Hollywood CGI & Motion Capture) allow the player to use the controller for a vast spectrum of game situations with incredible control accuracy. One of the demos showed off how to "air-write" with the controller, with incredibly precise results. The difference between Sony's and Microsoft's new controller entries is that in Microsoft's case the player actually need a controller to play.

Along with an army of popular game developers, both Sony and Microsoft made their case to the video game community that they are not only in the business to try and win and despite Nintendo's early lead, but also want to allow this generation of console hardware to still go strong. If today's announcement are any indiciation there's plenty of innovation left in the space. But what does E3 have to do with Investing?

Sony, despite its size is a vast gaming operation, and with the company posting its first yearly loss, it needs the Gaming operation to deliver incredible results in the years going forward. This will not happen without 1) Exciting innovations in the hardware (and lower costs) and 2) Developers excited about making games for that hardware. Sony has been in 3rd place in console sales since the PS3 launch but it has a long lifetime committed to the platform and even still sells a lot of PS2 machines. The bet on Blu-Ray as a standard will be debated for a long time as to whether it helped or hurt the PS3 in its early years, but the fact remains that Sony still loses money on each sale. The one thing consumers are clamoring for they still haven't received with the machine and that's a deeper price cut! Until it can cut those costs, Sony may simply have to suffer through more months at number 3 on the sales charts.

But with an upcoming stable of games, the new PSP Go and an impressive Motion Controller demo Sony is hitting the right track with Gamers and Developers, and Sony's stock followed suit with a gain of over 2% to close at $28/share.

Microsoft on the other hand, prints money from Windows and Office and doesn't really need a Gaming division, or does it? It in fact needs the XBox to succeed now more than ever for one simple reason. Image! Microsoft has a huge image problem amongst the computer using youth, with a floundering Windows Mobile team being eclipsed by Apple's iPhone, the disaster that was Windows Vista opening the door to more mainstream Mac usage, and the ignorance of anything related to Search the company can come up with due to Google's dominance in the area. This "Old-man's" Microsoft, being out-innovated by hipster companies will eventually trickle down to its core businesses.

The devices group may be that saving grace, while the Zune hadn't exactly lit anything on fire, the original XBox was a good start that has picked up steam with the XBox 360. The innovations of Project Natal, specifically the player controller, are the kinds of things the computer buying youth can get excited about, and once you've got them, if Microsoft can link the XBox brand with the Microsoft corporate image, a Windows user may come back or emerge. Microsoft stock was up about 2% on the day of its E3 speech and sits at $21.40/share.

While Video Games may have been child's play in the past, this business is as important as ever and some of the biggest tech names on the planet rely on a little old conference to reshape an entire corporate vision. Maybe its time to put a little stock into what things like E3 and those who attend have to say.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL, holds no position in any stock mentioned.

Technology Market Leadership Part 2: Apple beats again

With the Nasdaq pacing the other market indicators throughout the trading day, it was clear that Technology was on the mind of most Traders.  With eBay (EBAY) reporting numbers to an enthusiastic response, next in line was the mighty folks from Cupertino, waving their iPhones and Macs, sans Legal Copy (If you haven't seen the latest I'm a Mac ads you are missing out on high comedy).

For Apple (AAPL), this quarter was met with tempered expectations.  Charts and Graphs flew across the Internet, projecting the sky was falling for the Mac.  Well not exactly falling, but some rather large chinks in the armor were showing.  Microsoft (MSFT) ads that actually garnered praise! Mac sales at a year over year drop for the first time since 2003! Apple not in the fast growing netbook Market! Pres, Androids, Berrys aplenty! Where's Steve?  I think you get the gist, a lot of shouting and hand waving by analysts and the media, some thoughtful, most not so much.

Even, Apple's number 1 business fan, CNBC's Jim Goldman, in a recent piece was comparing Macs to PCs on price and intangibles, made a point to mention that Macs come with Photoshop!? Perhaps a confused slip of the tongue but nonetheless tried and true stockholders are wondering if anyone outside the Apple circle truly understands the business. And in all likelihood, that's the reason the shares are so under appreciated and victims of manipulation and rumor.

But there's a little something called cold hard facts, and Apple's been providing them aplenty, quarter after quarter.  And with that, providing what seems like quarter after quarter of what I like to call 2/3rds guidance. When will the pros just forget about those last two sentences in every Apple press release.

But now to the hard hitting stuff, the news that matters, the numbers.

• Revenue: $8.16Billion vs $7.7Billion expected
  
• Earnings: $1.33/share vs $1.09/share expected
  
• Mac Units: 2.2Million vs 2.1-2.2 expected
  
• iPod: 11Million vs 10Million expected
  
• iPhone: 3.8Million vs 3.3Million expected

That's as clean a sweep across the board as you can see.  The worrisome figures for most coming in was the Mac line, however this business is on solid footing now as the recent desktop line upgrades start to bring in repeat customers while the popular MacBook designs continue to impress laying Mac styling in front of and towards the general public.  In an economy where the most popular computers across the board are $300-$500 netbooks, Apple is doing very well at its "premium" price points.  The upgraded Mac Mini and the last generation MacBook give Apple some penetration in the sub-$1000 market.

iPhones continue to be big, and not only for Apple.  Analysts were scrambling to revise their iPhone estimates upwards as AT&T (T) reported very strong wireless results as part of their quarterly report.  With 1.6Million iPhone activations (only 300K less comparatively to the holiday quarter) AT&T was quick to point out that iPhone subscriber churn is extremely low (customers love their iPhones) and iPhone ARPU was 1.6 times the average (customers love spending on data plans).

Basically the iPhone's little sister, the iPhone Touch continued to increase in popularity as the AppStore has proven to be an incredible driver of not only adoption, but also loyalty.  With Apple about to cross 1Billion applications downloaded this marketplace becomes the fastest growing software distribution channel in history.  With combined iPhone and iPod Touch sales totalling 37Million units and counting, the install base for developers is only continuing to grow. And as Apple readies the reported and rumored "iPod Touch HD", their curveball into the netbook/tablet market, be sure it'll be accompanied by an AppStore of its own.

How did Investors react to the news? At first nonchalantly, Apple sold off late in the day as worries seemed to creep into the stock.  After-hours however a 3% gain on solid results but sluggish guidance.  The guidance number was partially explained on the call, which I'm sure has yet been properly disseminated.  Apple is recording no Revenue from iPhones sold after their March event of iPhone software 3.0.  This is all due to some technically complex accounting rules that allow their subscription based model to yadda yadda yadda (Insert Legal Copy). In a nutshell, by doing this they can legally give iPhone users the upgrade for free.  iPod Touch users however, are stuck with another Hamilton (Doesn't have the same ring to it as a Benjamin does it?).

Since the software is set to come out in June, that's essentially an entire quarter of 0 recognized iPhone revenue.  Kinda sounds like it fits nicely in the gap between Apple Revenue guidance and Analyst Revenue expectations doesn't it? Provided that the analysts have finally deciphered the enigma code that is Apple's subscription accounting method wherein all iPhone revenues, profits etc are split amongst 8 quarters while the rest is deferred into an ever increasing cash pile which at the moment stands at $29Billion.

To be fair, Apple has begun giving Non-GAAP accounting to try to set Wall St. straight.  And by those metrics, the earnings are just staggering.

• The Current Quarter: $1.84/share
  
• Last Quarter: $2.58/share
  
• Quarter before that: $2.74/share

So the last 3 quarters of "real" earnings paint a picture of $7.16/share in earnings for a stock priced at $125. That's a P/E of 17 in 3 Non-GAAP quarters!  Considering the $33/share in cash that Apple holds, that 3-quarter P/E ratio falls to 13. Looking ahead to the next quarter on a Non-GAAP basis and Apple is likely to earn close to $9/share (vs a comparitive estimate of the GAAP earnings of about $5.55/share).

This company is still undervalued, and while their entry into the netbook/tablet space will be closely watched, so will be the return of CEO Steve Jobs.  Rumors and stock market games aside, Apple is an incredible money printing design house and because of its accounting rules it still seems "expensive" to some.  An injustice that will hopefully be corrected as next-quarter analysts will have a full year of Non-GAAP numbers to look over and use in their predictions.  Then maybe it'll be Apples to Apples.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL, T, holds Call Options in MSFT

Smartphone Wars to heat up this Summer

The new hotness, no not Twitter, but the smartphone, is gearing for an all hands on deck gadget war this year and beyond. While smartphones have been around for sometime, it was only until recently (read: iPhone) that momentum has picked up faster than Usain Bolt. With two main rivals now leading the charge, Research In Motion (RIM) and Apple (AAPL).

This isn't a 2 horse race however, nor will it be over soon. As RIM executive Jim Balsillie recently said on the company's conference call in baseball terms, the smartphone wars are somewhere in the 2nd inning. What may seem like an Apple and RIM race to win, certainly can be turned upside down with entrants from all of the world. Although smartphones account for less than a third of the phone market, they command nearly 90% of the media coverage and almost all of the growth. According to Mobile Advertising Network AdMob, smartphone share increased from 26% to 33% in the past 6 months. This growth trend seems likely to continue as popularity in these devices continue to gain and subsidies for the most popular devices reign in even the most worrisome economic consumer.

Although Nokia (NOK), may be the biggest phone maker in the world, its smartphones have yet to inspire consumer desires such as the iPhone from Apple or the Blackberry Bold from RIM. Although by sheer volume, Nokia with its range of models holds 3 of the top 5 most popular smartphones spots globally, trailing only the aforementioned iPhone. Trends are shaped by consumer decisions as well as the push from corporate entities, and as such none of these companies are standing still, nor can they afford to.

What's on the horizon then? An analyst at Barclays is reporting that Apple has doubled iPhone production in anticipation of new models coming in June (Link). Recent iPhone speculation has pointed to not one but two phone models expected out of Cupertino this time around, conveniently coinciding with the release of Mobile OS X software version 3.0 in June. When Apple reports results for the first calendar quarter of 2009 it will surely surpass 20Million unit sales for the iPhone, not too shabby in about a year an a half.

With the AppStore becoming a global phenomenon Apple is making it extremely tough for users to ever switch away from an iPhone. If you've spent hard earned money on applications to make your phone function exactly how you want it to and have the features you want, you'll of course be less tempted to switch to something else if it means losing those precious applications. When iTunes purchases only worked on iPods for all those years, it drove an upgrade cycle for the company like nothing the music industry had ever seen.

RIM, fresh off the release of a new Curve, the well-received Bold and the mixed touchscreen Storm, has had information leak out about 3 new devices codenamed Onyx, Driftwood and Magnum. This coming from a company that had shipped almost 8 million devices in its most recently announced quarterly results, sending shares higher by 20%. RIM is certainly hard at work, but its not an easy task convincing the general public the virtues of a Blackberry. Always the device of choice for the business user, as smartphones have become increasingly consumer-focused RIM had a tough balancing act to strive for. For the most part, judging by the results, RIM has done very well. Initial critical thrashing of the touchscreen Storm notwithstanding the device has been successful and further forays into iPhone touchscreen territory by RIM will likely be greatly improved. And not a soul can say negative things about the hardware RIM uses for its keyboards, they are always top-notch.

Palm (PALM) has somehow starting erasing its name from the gravestone it was surely destined to have after several quarters of significant losses. The driving force for the resurgence! A little device by the name of the Palm Pre. Wowing audiences earlier in the year with iPhone-like admiration, the Pre is set to launch in the US soon, followed by International markets later in the year. There still is much at stake for Palm, but the feedback thus far has been incredibly positive on the new device, and with the work put into Palm's WebOS platform the company, and consumers, expect a wide range of WebOS devices going forward.

Google's (GOOG) Android has had a rather slow start but will likely pick up steam in the latter parts of the year as not only a second handset from HTC, the company that produced the G1 for T-Mobile, is due as well as multiple devices from Samsung. With carriers in the US and abroad looking at, adopting, and testing Android, it seems only a matter of time before Google's vision of hundreds of Android phones becomes a reality. T-Mobile is even talking about launching Home phones and netbooks running Android, and a recent story about HP had the company confirming it will be testing Android for its netbooks. The free, open-source platform has proved resilient despite some questionable early roots, and as the platform stabilizes and is available on more handsets and in more incarnations consumers will increasingly see Google's web based products, and ads, within their mobile world.

Like Google, Micrsoft (MSFT) has only been providing software for smartphones, however all the momentum a bloated Windows Mobile has garnered in the past has seemingly been lost in the past year. With flashier devices like iPhones, Blackberrys, Androids and Pres being on consumer minds the battle remains uphill for Microsoft. A software overhaul is needed for Windows Mobile and it certainly doesn't help the company that it announced a visual overhaul (Version 6.5) but slated it for release at the end of this year, while a proper, better Windows Mobile 7 is scheduled to come sometime in 2010. Microsoft can't afford to wait much longer as Android gains momentum, and while the other most popular smartphones all run their own platforms.

All in all, consumers will have an abudance of choice in 2009 and beyond, and as their devices do more things they need, the world as we know it will change from the at-home/at-work Internet dominated era to the mobile/on-the-go Internet dominated era. The one constant is being connected and with each software platform making a better Internet experience each time around the debate surrounding Internet browsing is fading. The only way to get ahead in this game is to bring incredible new features (such as 3rd party applications) wrapped in elegant hardware that consumers feel inspired to purchase and use. While Apple and RIM are leading in that sense now, by the time this year's crop of devices are released we may just be nearing the bottom of the 4th.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL, GOOG, owns long-term call options on MSFT

Friday Market Notes

With the majors hovering around the flat line for most of the morning trade, the one thing that's easy to determine is the market's general lack of direction. Stimulus news dissemination could be the main culprit, but more than likely its the sparse rash of headlines that paint a directionless picture.

Making waves this morning are further retail struggles at Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF) with a 4th quarter year over year drop of 68% in earnings. Despite the profit fall, the company did meet tempered expectations despite Chairman Mike Jeffries comments about the industry having an end of year that could only be described as "catastrophe". Not giving guidance due to the hazy economics of the day, ANF finds itself well in the green up 11% on the results.

While the talk has been of retail disaster, Microsoft (MSFT) is taking the other approach and jumping into the retail sector. Taking a page or two from Apple's book (AAPL), the company has hired a former Wal-Mart-er to head a retail store operation. No details have yet been given in terms of specifics, but judging from Apple's incredible success with its retail chain, driving customers to purchase an ever growing arsenal of products, Microsoft will undoubtedly try to replicate the experience. A task easier said than done, but one the world's largest software company has to endeavor if only to stem the tide of mind share defectors form its Windows brand.

Well the Car business is still terrible, according to Toyota (TM). Inventory levels continue to be high as sales drop month after month, forcing Toyota to shut production at many of its facilities around the world. This includes plants in America, Canada and Mexico. The cost cutting measures, which also stem some executive pay, are the latest of efforts by a car maker to incite some sustainable increases to profitability. Increases that hopefully result in a spark to lagging share prices as the industry sits in a holding pattern waiting for consumers to reacquire credit and the desire to purchase big ticket items.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL

Microsoft's Search Strategy: Mo' Money Less Problems

With the Consumer Electronics Show having more of the media's attention than in recent years it was an opportune time for Microsoft (MSFT) to make the kind of splash during their annual speech the company needs. Granted part of the reason of the shifted media was Apple's (AAPL) MacWorld keynote speech, valiantly presented by stand-in Phil Schiller, focused on Apple software updates and lacked the ominous flair that "El Jobso" exudes or the shiny new toys gadget-connoisseurs have come to expect.

While Apple CEO Steve Jobs took a backseat this January it presented Microsoft head Steve Ballmer with a chance to speak at CES and present Microsoft's vision for not only renewed hope on its Operating System and Mobile front, where it's losing share to Apple, but also in Search, where it heavily trails juggernaut Google (GOOG).

While Microsoft has long tried to make inroads into Search, the company's approach has been the Biggie Smalls to Google's Puffy: "Mo' Money Mo' Problems". Year after year of throwing Billions of dollars at the cause hasn't resulted in any significant traction for Microsoft and in fact latest metrics show continued search share erosion. October-November data from comScore puts Google growing from 63.1% to 63.5% while Microsoft remains in 3rd place behind Yahoo (YHOO) falling from 8.5% to 8.3%. With the December holiday season on deck and the increase in search queries to boot it only stands to reason that Google continued to heavily outpace its two rivals.

Someone at Microsoft has been thinking about the late Notorious B.I.G., and finally the company has decided to try to turn the popular song around in its favour. The new strategy involves outbidding Google at every turn in order to put Live Search in front of as many "default" consumers as possible. It's a well known industry practice that companies pay hardware makers to have their products and services installed on default machines. Computers from Dell, Sony and HP all come with software from a variety of vendors beyond the standard Windows operating system, and recently this system has extended beyond hardware into web services as Google is in a deal with Mozilla (the makers of Firefox) to be the default search engine for the popular web browser. Microsoft hopes that by having many more default eyes on Live they can retain a high proportion of those users and turn them into searchers and ad-clickers. In essence: Mo' Money Less Problems.

Microsoft announced a couple of these partnerships during their CES presentation. The first with Dell, to have Windows Live essentials software pre-installed on all computers, which includes various software components including a browser toolbar and default search. The second with Verizon, and this may end up being the bigger of the two, to make Live Search the default search engine on Verizon phones. Microsoft clearly gave Verizon much better terms than Google as both companies were reported to be in the running for this deal. The 5 year exclusive partnership will see Microsoft search be put front and center to customers of now America's largest wireless carrier by subscribers.

Google of course now has its own Andriod operating system for Mobile devices and will look to that for growth, it also is the default search engine on Apple's incredibly popular iPhone and has its own Mobile Search application in the App Store. With an increasing number of web users becoming acclimatized to "google-ing", it will be difficult to say with certainty how many default users Microsoft can expect to keep for these partnerships. And you can certainly expect Google to be front and center in providing users with ways to have Google Search be installed alongside Microsoft's default offering or to replace it altogether. Either way shareholders of Microsoft need some sort of spark from the company, and with Windows 7 getting good press thus far, the Xbox successes and now the possibility of gains in Mobile and Desktop search the company may be finally ready to turn the corner.

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL, GOOG

IBM doesn't hear of 'Global Economic Slowdown'

The Technology Services and Computing Blue-Chip pre-announced its quarterly earnings Wednesday in an effort to boost confidence in not only its 52-week low stock price but also to provide a window into the upcoming economic effects facing 'Big Technology'. IBM (IBM), or Big Blue as it responds to in business circles offered a reassuring look into its future profitability despite the economic fears that have plagued all industry.

IBM told investors to expect at least $8.75/share in profits for the year, which is in-line with previous forecasts from the company, and a quarterly profit of $2.05/share beat analysts estimates of $2.01. The news had IBM stock up about 5% in the after-hours market, and the company continues to hover with a 3% gain this morning at the open.

While IBM is well represented on the technology side within the Financial Industry, the company hopes its long-term contracts hold up well against the failures in banking. Clearly as banks go belly up so do their IT departments and eventually so would all of their IBM server hardware. IBM is not immune to a global business slowdown but the company appears to be weathering the latest storm rather well. Although Revenue came in below average expectations, those numbers were in the midst of being adjusted downwards for the current economic situation. Nonetheless Revenue climbed 5% year over year to $25.3Billion.

The IBM news will spread some good faith across the technology sector and you can expect the usual suspects to be in line for positive openings, Intel (INTC), Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL) etc.

As the S&P struggles to finish in the green just one of these October days so far, it could just be Big Blue that will push markets with a new found confidence into earnings season and allow a sliver of buying to turn into bargain hunting Investing on a large scale. With yesterday's positive afternoon turned into a sea of selling late in the day, Investors will want to wait and see if this holds.

One thing is holding and that's IBM's profitability!

Disclosure: Author holds no position in any mentioned companies

Google throws its hat in the Browser & OS ring with shiny Chrome

Joining a "war" is neither a decision taken easily or for that matter lightly, especially one that historically has seen incumbents muscle and push out thriving rivals, (see Microsoft (MSFT) and Netscape) but Google (GOOG) is not just any company, and it hopes that in the future of web computing Chrome wont just be any browser. And with it perhaps change completely the role of the browser from presenting web pages, to managing web applications in the computers of tomorrow.

Lofty ambitions I know, but this is the same company that has plans to index the entire web, present a photographic view of the entire world, create renewable energy cheaper than coal, and house the complete archive of human information since the start of the written age. Google's getting well compensated for the lucrative advertising network it pioneered in Search and with that comes radically thinking about ways to out-innovate, out-maneuver, and out-class anything offered by main competitors.

Google's newly released "Beta" Chrome web browser is another hat in the ring that contains Microsoft's Internet Explorer (70% market share), Mozilla's Firefox (20% share) and Apple's (AAPL) Safari (6% share). However it has the potential to avoid the also-ran results of other browser efforts and truly usher in an age of web-computing. If this sounds like techno-babble, that's because it is, and Chrome is definitely not any sort of catalyst for Google's ailing stock right now.

View the GOOG WikiChart on Wikinvest

Unfortunately only blowout quarterly reports can do that for this richly valued company. The company is down significantly from all-time highs and Chrome will not get them back there anytime soon. This is an evolutionary step that just might end up being revolutionary when all is said and down.

Google's cash cow of serving up targeted advertising works now because it can collect information on users, their web habits and their searches. The more people who have Google Accounts and the more searches they do, helps Google tailor all those ads. Throw in the popular Google toolbar collecting user information and viola you've got an incredible breadth of information in which to base ad serving decisions on. However, browsers are evolving, not only from a functionality perspective but from a privacy perspective as well. Microsoft's newest browser will incorporate an InPrivate feature which will not store anything users do on the web if they choose to use it. If Google can't know what you've been doing on the web for the last 6 months those ads could start looking less and less attractive and Google will have to only rely on what users search for, assuming of course they use Google for search. Chrome has a similar feature but getting users on the Google experience is priority number 1 for the company.

While the above is a minor detail for browser technology, it is the main driver of Google profitability. The next driver of profitability, Google hopes, will be Web Applications, and their Google Apps suite which is shaping up with constant improvements to become a true Microsoft Office competitor. The difference of course is that Office you install on your own computer, whereas Google Apps, and the online suite of Productivity software, can be accessed from anywhere and collaborated on in real-time.

Industry people believe the browser will become the Operating System of the future!

Considering Microsoft's Windows is on 90% of computers, it is almost an impossible mountain to climb for someone new to create an Operating System. For Google, and looking into the future of web based applications the most logical step to creating an Operating System would be to create the Web Browser of the future. And in a matter of speaking they did.

Where previous browser were a single application that served up web pages and ran applications within itself, Chrome spawns processes for each web page or web application, and includes a task manager to manage them. If something crashed on one web page, only that web page would fail while others would remain perfectly isolated. Process Task Management, Individual Processes for each web application sounds a lot like an Operating System to me. If Google wants to get serious about challenging Microsoft in the OS and Business Software games in the years to come it needs to control how users will access their web applications. A Web Browser that controls each web application individually, and even each component of each web application individually, is exactly the steps Google has to take.

By creating Chrome they've started this journey, and by making the entire project open-source and given out for free, they can quickly and nimbly adapt suggestions, improvements and changes from the developer community at large. As with a first release there will always be kinks to iron out, however the prognosis looks really good, and with a feature set comparable to the fastest growing browsers, in terms of popularity, Firefox and Safari, Google has the brand power and the clout to make a real dent in this industry. It is hard gaining market share in anything, and in the browser-war it is notoriously difficult so by throwing its hat into thing ring, Google's also throwing caution to the wind and hoping they'll be early enough for the web revolution.

Just don't expect the revolution to happen overnight Traders!

Disclosure: Author owns GOOG

Technology News & Market Notes: May 6th

Techno-Superhero Iron Man delivered almost $100Million at the domestic box office for Marvel (MVL) over the weekend and brought with it a shift in Market News as Technology Stocks have been the focus. Trading started the day lower but drifted towards the green as the day went on, eventually keeping the Dow, Nasdaq & S&P all with gains on the day.

Although Microsoft (MSFT) over the weekend withdrew its bid for Yahoo (YHOO), over a pricing issue, the sentiment across the street is that this deal has may have legs. Microsoft offered to raise its bid to $33/share while Yahoo remained firm at $37. Yahoo shareholders felt the brunt of the pain as Monday the stock lost 15%. A 6% rebound Tuesday, is largely attributed to Yahoo executives reiterating to the press they are still willing to negotiate. Microsoft has a couple choices, and even though they refused to go into a proxy fight to overthrow Yahoo's board of directors once, Traders seem to think a 2nd go-round is likely.

The dance with these two historic tech names will likely continue in the coming weeks and for what its worth, how badly Microsoft needs an effective brand presence in the growing Internet economy makes it pretty certain that the company will continue to pursue Yahoo, hoping this initial backing-away will build shareholder angst at Yahoo and force more favourable negotiations.

Apple (AAPL) made more headlines and extended its recent stock run as it announced partnerships with a couple carriers to expand iPhone distribution. Both deals revolve around the "sometime later this year" time-frame, so the thinking is that the European partners are waiting for the ever-so-coveted 3G iPhone to make its debut at the WorldWide Developer Conference in early June. Apple made deals with Vodafone to distribute the iPhone in 10 counties including India, Australia and Italy. Apple changed its business model for iPhone distribution in Italy by also partnering with Telecom Italia in that region. Other countries on the iPhone slate include Czech Republic, Egypt, Greece, Portugal, New Zealand, South Africa, Turkey and Canada (based on recent announcements by Rogers Communications (RCI.B)).

Disclosure: Author owns AAPL

Google's Q1 Earnings blow past Estimates

Search giant and Internet bell-weather Google (GOOG) reported 1st quarter results after the closing bell Thursday and although Traders were confused and opinions varied wildly the company blew the doors off of another strong 3 months. These strong results came to $4.12/share in earnings versus an estimated $3.96/share. Excluding items Google earned $4.84/share vs an expected $4.55/share.

Profit this quarter rose to $1.3Billion from $1Billion on a year over year basis and perhaps even more impressively, climbed from $1.2Billion over the holiday quarter. With that also comes net cash additions of almost $1Billion into Google's coffers. At the top line, Revenue was also impressive as Google for the first time broke the $5Billion revenue mark for a quarter. Also, for the first time, International Revenue led US Revenue by a 51-49% margin.

So is there anything negative to be said about the quarter? Well, International growth has been very strong, and this is somewhat inflated by the weakening of the US dollar. A nit-pick point for some but Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) reported a majority of its quarterly growth was simply due to currency conversion. Traders weren't too impressed and sent JNJ lower. The response to Google's International growth and quarterly numbers? Overwhelmingly positive, with shares up in After-hours almost $75 to $524, after closing at $449 in regular trading.

Was DoubleClick a factor in the increased numbers? No, in fact management's statement relayed to Investors that DoubleClick's revenue was completely immaterial and income was dilutive to the general numbers. DoubleClick will become a factor in Google's earnings going forward but for the first quarter this part of the company was in the fold for only 20 days. Google is also being adamant about reducing headcount from DoubleClick due to overlap, which should lower DoubleClick's expense footprint going forward.

The margin question? Google maintained the same 30% margins that the company witnessed over the holiday quarter. The good news on this front is the fall of Traffic Acquisition Costs (TAC) to 29.2% from 30.3% in the holiday quarter. Maybe results were boosted by a low tax rate? Google's tax rate this quarter: 24%, comparing to the holiday quarter tax rate of 25%. Seemingly a non-issue when it comes to these quarterly results.

Google seems to be positioning itself to grow even more substantially internationally and as the slowdown in the US, especially in the Financial Sector, continues to put pressure on earnings and advertising Google seems poised to hold their own and continue to deliver top notch results. The recently completed test ad partnership with Yahoo (YHOO) was reported to be a success and Yahoo is reportedly trying to expand the partnership in order to shore up its own bottom-line. Just a testament to how efficient and ahead of the game Google's AdWords and AdSense programs really are.

Due to today's after-hours stock surge, Google will be once again in a P/E range bordering on expensive (trailing P/E of 37, forward P/E about 30) given the overall US economic picture, but when comparing it to its main Internet competitors such as Yahoo, the company is simply executing better and deserves its premium valuation. As CEO Eric Schmidt put it "It's clear to us that we're well positioned for 2008 and beyond, regardless of the business environment that we find ourselves surrounded by".

Google's Ad game is in full stride with AdSense and AdWords, the earnings and revenue speak for themselves, but now with the beginnings of monetization of YouTube and Video Advertising Google is looking beyond search ads towards next generation drivers of explosive growth. This same strategy applies to DoubleClick with banner/display advertising also. Becoming an all-encompassing Ad-Platform is clearly in Google's sights, as is their long term plan/goal of becoming a $100Billion Revenue company.

Google's dominance in search is well know and for yet another quarter, its ability to monetize and deliver outstanding growth has also been confirmed. With its main competitors in Search (Yahoo and Microsoft (MSFT)) dancing away and towards each other with Merger talks and other distractions, the core search advertising business is Google's for the taking.

Disclosure: Author owns GOOG

Microsoft shows $44Billion, eyes Yahoo, to take on Google

On the morning of a rare Google (GOOG) earnings miss, the world's largest software company, Microsoft (MSFT), is taking full advantage of the negativity and swinging its own news story. The Seattle company disclosed to the public that it has offered $31/share ($44Billion) to purchase Yahoo! (YHOO). This combined Microsoft Internet division would be a stronger second place competitor to Google's search and advertising dominance.

Google reportedly owns about 60% of search share and almost 70% of search advertising dollars, with competitors, mainly Yahoo and Microsoft, claiming the remaining scraps. Mind you those scraps, can amount to plenty in a business sector expected to expand from $40Billion to $80Billion in value in the coming years. The scope, breadth and quality of advertising is increasing on the Internet as its ease of use, ease of tracking, and ROI effectiveness become clearler to companies all over the world. While still a small piece of the overall advertising pie, the Internet provides the most complete customer profile available for any form of advertising.

Now this is a point of contention, the whole privacy issue, but the fact remains that most things on the Internet can be tracked, and the more advertisers and advertising platforms know about their users, the more effective the ads can be. Google knows this very well, hence their dominant position! Microsoft and Yahoo know this as well but they've failed to make any strides on their own. Perhaps the combined division can put a dent in Google's cash-hording fortress. (At last check Google as a business is still extremely young and has almost $20Billion in the bank)

Let's hope the deal goes through, for Yahoo investors sake anyway. The stock has been beaten up of late falling to its lowest level in several years at $18 and change per share. Microsoft's offer represents an over 60% premium from Yahoo's closing price yesterday. But before we tout this as the resurrgence of Microsoft's Internet division (A business line that is still bleeding losses year after year), lets expand on thier strategy and ambitions here.

First, its clear Microsoft wants to be in the Internet Advertising space, and be successful at it. It's the future of advertising and its extremely lucrative and high margin. Secondly, Yahoo's the only big player with a decent following and even a shot at dethroning Google. It makes sense right, to just combine 2nd and 3rd place, and eventually maybe they'll cause a stir. Unfortunately the gold medalist here right now is the behemoth known as Google. And unless Google's been mysteriously taking Human Growth Hormone they wont topple themselves off the podium anytime soon.

There's plenty of problems I see with this deal, and not even first on my list is the sheer smell of desperation on Microsoft's part to completely over pay to get this deal done. Yes it's true, they tried to talk to Yahoo a year ago and were told to go home. So they came back, with thicker pockets and the attitude of "No, is unacceptable". Granted this deal would still have to pass through all sorts of regulatory hurdles but that shouldn't cause too much of a delay. The biggest problem is SYNERGY. I would imagine lots of Yahooligans are going to be out of work, unfortunately. Do you think corporate cultures easily come together. Not a chance. It takes long, hard work to make even the simpliest teams fit together, let alone putting a company like Yahoo, with over 11,000 employees, inside of Microsoft.

Interestingly enough, it wasn't too long ago that Microsoft head Steve Balmer was talking up a storm on how Microsoft's strategy will be to make smaller niche acquitions and develope integrated web services and all that jazz. Now it seems this is a complete shift in the opposite direction. The thing you know about Microsoft though, is that when they smell blood, and trust me, Yahoo is bleeding mercilessly, they go for the kill. In the end Yahoo shareholders must be smiling because they have just been bailed out of a 50% decline in their company stock.

Now there's been big time deals that have completely blown up when firms weren't in the same industry. AOL-Time Warner come to mind perhaps? But even within the same industry, it doesn't always work. Diamler-Chrysler? Can you say disaster? Now I'm optimistic that if Yahoo accepts, and it most likely will, there will be better times ahead for both companies in the Internet space. Micrsoft's platform for advertising has failed to excite anyone, and Yahoo's Panama Ad Center was seen to be its saviour once. Perhaps together they can work out the kinks and actually leverage all those millions of unused hotmail and yahoo mail accounts. Yahoo still is a giant Internet portal with lots of user traffic, and with that comes great potential. The key is Clear Focus and Strategy and perhaps that's something that Microsoft can bring to the table for a scrambling Yahoo and its convulated Internet vision. How long this will take to integrate and fulfill? Not even the experts know that, but trust me, it will not be soon.

On the upside, we know Microsoft is loaded and extremely patient when it comes to new initiatives. They can lose money for years to try and make a footprint. Let's just hope for Microsoft shareholders, that this isn't looked back on in history as a major stumble in its quest for the Internet. Microsoft's Ad platform has a long way to go but perhaps with Yahoo's profitable help they can get on track and mount a serious offensive on the next phase of the Internet business.

Disclosure: Author is long GOOG

Google Opens Up about Mobile Strategy, new Platform called Android shows Promise

Reports trickled in over the weekend that Monday was to be the day that the long awaited "gPhone" announcement would come in some form. Google (GOOG) complied with those rumors and held a conference call announcing an Open Mobile Platform rooted in a Linux based Operating System.

This system, dubbed Android, was announced by Google and several of its partners in the Open Handset Alliance, including Qualcomm, T-Mobile, HTC, Sprint and Motorola. Over 30 partners in all for the Internet search giant, all committed to produce the technology to make a powerful, open Operating System for cell phones a reality. Google will provide the backbone programming for the Linux-based OS and will release an SDK (Software Development Kit) so that developers of all shapes and sizes will be able to create applications for a multitude of devices.

The first of these devices are expected to be available in the 2nd half of next year touting as its main feature a complete full scale Web Browser, much like Apple's Safari on the iPhone or the Opera Mini browser available for certain other smart-phones. Thus far details are scarce and not well known about Android, but next week's sneak peak at the SDK should give several more clues. This open initiative by Google comes right after the announcement of OpenSocial, an open development platform for Social Network sites, with which Google has signed up several partners including MySpace, LinkedIn, Salesforce.com and its own Orkut network.

The power of the mobile Internet is something Google has its sights squarely on, and the advertising platform that that could bring. The world has billions of cell phone users and over a billion handsets are sold each year, which represents a fantastic opportunity for localized and personalized advertising. It just so happens that Google has become a virtual expert at both of those flavors of ad-serving. Analysts and economists are throwing around estimates for growth in the mobile ad space and their particular 'Billions of $$$ by Year X' don't matter just yet, what does, is the resounding emphasis that it is the next great Internet growth sector.

The Android platform will provide Google a foundation to port its Internet software on a multitude of devices, and as CEO Eric Schmidt pointed out during the call:

"This is not an announcement for gPhone, we hope to see thousands of gPhones"

The thinking by Google of course, is that, why make the hardware when so many others already do. Create a platform that will excite partners, can cater to everyone's needs, and everyone succeeds. Google doesn't make the computers that sit at your desk do they? No! But they provide an expansive software platform and a multitude of services that arguably are simpler and better than competitive services. With powerful enough phone hardware and screens that can somewhat do justice to the "Complete Internet" Google can follow the same model with cell phones that they have used to dominate in the Internet space for Personal Computers. Not to mention innovation can foster truly and freely on an open software platform, which Android is touted as being. Google's planning to be there every step of the way and innovate as quickly as they can in this space.

Google shares have risen tremendously since August lows around $500/share, hitting a new all time high of $730 today, closing at $725. The hype built around a mobile push by Google stemmed some profit taking but the potential of this being a major platform and a revamp in mobile industry thinking is too hard to pass up for Investors. The sentiment that phone carriers lock in consumers and halt innovation, both on the hardware and software side, can die a quick and painful death if an open software platform for mobile devices in embraced. Google knows this as do its partners, and most importantly customers are starting to take notice as well.

The mobile space, especially for advertising is still wide open and Google is trying to out innovate its major competitors Yahoo (YHOO) and Microsoft (MSFT). Both companies of course missing from Google's partner list on this project. The simple fact in the mobile industry is that cell phones are turning more and more into little powerful computers capable of doing much more than phone calls and this is no different with the Internet. Consumers will see Internet on their phones much more prominently over the coming months/years and the expectation will be for a complete and encompassing experience.

The quicker that experience becomes reality the quicker Google will be able to grow into a mobile advertising conglomerate. Today's technology consumer is much more mobile than in years past and the thinking is, and I completely agree, that these mobile users will have many more opportunities to use Google products such and Search, Gmail and Maps on the go. With more usage, comes more advertising placement opportunities when it will really matter. Getting advertisements for local restaurants when you're at home is one thing but getting localized and personalized ads for local restaurants when you're hungry and on the town is something completely different. And for this to work well, Android must become the platform of choice.

Disclosure: Author is long GOOG

Markets End Week on a high, boosted by further Strong Earnings

Microsoft (MSFT) led the markets higher as its quarterly earnings surpassed estimates. The Dow finished up 1% and the Nasdaq almost 2%. Hope in the Financials was somewhat restored today also as Countrywide Financial (CFC) painted a hopeful picture for Mortgage recovery.

CFC, seemingly America's poster child for the credit crisis situation, rose over 30% as the company provided an outlook that signalled recovery. Investors met this with broad buying in many large and tailored financial names. The big banks, including Bank Of America (BAC) and Citigroup (C), after being pressured all week, recovered a few percentage points.

On the heels of the red hot IPO of VMWare (VMW), parent company EMC (EMC) reported a stellar quarter and outlook Thursday. Shares lifted EMC to new highs and Friday sent the stock to a record of close to $25/share. The company was hovering around $18-$19 when a small stake of VMWare went public recently, and subsequently more than doubled.

Investors will wait for the Fed Rate Decision to come in the week ahead but the hope instilled by CFC has to provide some foundation for recovery in the battered sub-prime sector. The start of a recovery for the big banks and trading houses should filter through as well. All eyes will be on the Fed in the trading days to come.

Market Musings Oct 24, S&P Changes add NYX, and Facebook news

The Markets came back strong to the close on Wednesday after being down fairly significantly mid-day. News of the struggling Housing sector and brokerage house Merrill Lynch (MER) writing down over $8Billion due to the Credit Crunch rattled investors and traders. A not so earth shattering outlook from high flier Amazon (AMZN) didn't help Technology stocks either.

The economic news on Existing Home Sales hurt stocks at the start as sales fell 8% year over year, which was worse than most economists had expected. Lots of talk about this "not yet being the bottom" led to further fears and thus more selling. Stocks seemed to bottom out however mid-day and recovered to be only flat or slightly lower. Technology was hurt by Amazon's perception of next quarter margins, which had investors heading for the profit taking fence.

NYSE Euronext (NYX) was up again today, hitting a recent high of $92, before settling at $90/share at the close, on news that it is about to be inserted into the S&P 500 and S&P 100 indices. This news was confirmed earlier in the week but today marked the last trading day before the company was to be officially recognized. Shares of NYX have rallied almost 9% since the announcement. The sheer number of money managers and funds that now have to own the company will likely continue to drive the shares higher going into its earnings report in early November. The stock is still off of its $112/share 52-week high but with a strong report and continued buying demand it may be sooner rather than later that the stock breaks into that territory.

Facebook, everybody's new favourite uber-growth social network, made more headlines today with a couple major announcements by big technology companies. Research In Motion (RIMM) announced a new application for its popular BlackBerry devices that ties in with Facebook, further promoting Rim's plans to nip at the heels of the consumer market segment. Microsoft (MSFT) threw its name into the social network hat as it agreed to purchase a 1.6% stake in Facebook for $240Million. The transaction gives Microsoft better leverage against its main Internet advertising competitors; Google (GOOG) and Yahoo (YHOO), and values Facebook at a lofty $15Billion.

Disclosure: Author is long NYX, GOOG

Earnings Preview: Week of Oct 22nd

To say the Markets took a breather Friday would be a grave understatement. The selling was balanced, on heavy volume and carried on throughout the day. The major indices; Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P were all lower about 2.5%. Earnings season continues this week and more major companies will have the spotlight on them.

The week kicks off Monday with Computer and iPod/iPhone maker Apple Inc. (AAPL) reporting what is wildly expected to be another blowout earnings number for Technology stocks. Drug makers will also see action this week as Merck (MRK) and Schering-Plough (SGP) report Monday as well with Amgen (AMGN) and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) set to follow later in the week.

AT&T (T) looks to capitalize on the popular iPhone as it highlights a busy Tuesday and software giant Microsoft (MSFT) headlines another busy earnings Thursday. Aerospace will feature also Lockheed Martin (LMT) reports as does Boeing (BA)

Investors and Traders will be looking for earnings to set a positive direction in order to drive further gains well into the Fall. Friday's pause was seen as healthy profit taking with a very cautious undertone. If the general earnings trend continues to be above-expectations than the market should have little resistance upwards, possibly no matter what the Fed does at its next Interest Rate decision.

Yahoo's New Search Tool shows how far ahead Google is

Google (GOOG), the dominant player in search and search advertising, is seeing its competitors constantly nipping at its heels and it seemingly ignores them and continues to innovate. While Yahoo (YHOO), Microsoft (MSFT), and Interactive's Ask (IACI) are trying to revamp, recreate and reinvigorate the search experience in the hopes of gaining market share and hence more advertisers, Google is padding its lead and running away with first rate technology innovations.

Ask.com has some neat complete search functions and combines results of all types of media and even includes little previews, but it is still a minor player in the search game. Microsoft's failed MSN unit is still around and kicking and losing ever more money, while the revamped Live platform has yet to gain any traction and Microsoft is continually seeing search share losses. Microsoft even tried to lure searchers by offering them points in exchange for prizes when they did searches and even included games inside MSN Messenger that forced users to search for answers to questions. Sorry Softie, but that's not gonna win over the advertisers and not gonna get people to give up on Google altogether.

Yahoo's newest feature, billed as a Search "Innovation", while positive for the languishing company, signals just how far behind the company is on the technology spectrum. Yahoo was once the poster child for the future of the Internet and these days it seemingly can't catch a break as revenue growth is slowing, share prices are slipping and it loses portions of market share to Google every quarter. The new feature for Yahoo is "Search-Assist", which is a Search Suggestion/Completion tool that slides out when users type in a search keyword. As a user starts typing into the search box a list of common or relevant search terms comes up. Pretty cool huh! It is beneficial but looking behind the scenes I think tells a different story. Let's step back and see just what this says about Yahoo's tactics.

I think it showcases a desperation on Yahoo's part that it simply doesn't have the back end grunt to truly become a personalized search power house. A Power House that Google is slowing but surely building as it releases tools such as Web History, iGoogle and Personalized Search. All those quarters of increasing Capital Expenditures that analysts were frightened about are proving well worth their weight in gold as Google is able to completely change the search game again and again while its competitors struggle to keep up. Yahoo's search box suggestions come off as simply common or popular search terms, while all well and good, that's actually a step sideways and not forwards in the technological sense.

As the Internet expands and the plethora of information becomes exceedingly complex only YOU can determine exactly what YOU'RE looking for, not everybody else. Google's got you covered. A recent post on Google's official blog states (Link) that Yes its concerned about the huge privacy issues and its doing all it can but it also is working tremendously to tailor the Internet to each user.

"search algorithms that are designed to take your personal preferences into account, including the things you search for and the sites you visit, have better odds of delivering useful results for you. So if you’ve been checking out sites about the Louvre and you search for 'Paris', you’re more likely to get results about the French capital than the celebrity heiress" Additionally Google goes on to showcase that a search for Football in Chicago is completely different than a search for Football in London, England.

Google is taking localized and personalized search into realms that its competitors can only dream of getting to. This is all due to that massive technology spending to build out an infrastructure of computing that can handle incredible complexity when it comes to something that should be as simple as search. That is why Google gets a majority of search traffic, has higher click-through rates for its tailored advertisements, continues to grow rapidly and demands a market premium via a lofty valuation.

Yahoo, Microsoft and Ask right now are simply out of their league when it comes to search innovations. Google has the brains, with its thousands of dedicated creative employees, it has the brawn, with its incredible breadth of technology infrastructure, and it has bank roll to keep innovating in ever expanding new areas of not only Search Technology but all aspects of our daily Internet lives.

Disclosure: Author is long GOOG