Wachovia posts Loss, brings down banking sector further

Wachovia (WB) joins the list of Financials that promise one thing and deliver another as it reports a quarterly loss and tries to raise more cash, $7Billion worth, with a further offering. The 4th largest bank in America gave Wall Street a loss of $0.20/share vs. an expected $0.40/share profit.

Revenue was also weak at $7.89Billion vs. $7.98 expected. The numbers do in fact speak for themselves and when you've got the CEO coming out and saying that he's very disappointed in the results it's not a good look for another Financial name. But wait! Wasn't this the same CEO that months prior promised that things would be better, promised that the dividend is safe, promised a turnaround? In fact it is! But good things aren't meant to last and Wachovia's $0.64/share dividend (a yield of almost 9% at current valuations) wasn't meant to last either.

With losses, come jobs cuts and dividend slashes. Much like it's bigger sibling in the banking world, Citigroup (C), Wachovia was forced, by this credit and mortgage mess, to cut its dividend by about 40% to $0.375/share. While still a respectable 5% yield, bringing it in-line with banking peers, the move comes as a blow to shareholders hoping for a turnaround in the near turn. Investors would hope in the best case that the high yield would correct itself based on a higher stock price, not on a dividend cut.

So what about the promises of the dividend being safe, made not too long ago? Can any Investor really know whether that was genuine or a 'buy some time' gesture? The fact remains that in the Financial Sector, throughout this Credit Crisis traders have seen many executives promise to hold the fort, then be unable to deliver. Most recently that was seen with Bear Stearns (BSC), where the executives relayed to Wall Street their 'solid as a rock' liquidity position, only to require a bailout days later by JP Morgan Chase (JPM) and the New York Federal Reserve.

Bright spots for Wachovia seem to be few and far between as the company took a further $2Billion in write-downs and set aside another $2.8Billion for future loan losses. One such bright spot, for the capital position of the bank is its new stock offering. While traders punished the company today, sending shares lower by almost 10%, selling almost $7Billion in stock (common and preferred) has to be seen as a longer term positive. Shoring up the balance sheet is priority number 1 for Wachovia, and once that's taken care of the bank can begin its rebound, its stock climb based on solid earnings, and it's return to higher dividend yields.

Disclosure: Author does not own any of the companies mentioned

Markets continue Rally on Home Sales and Bear bid

US Markets continued their rally today as the market opened after the Easter Weekend.
On a weekend highlighted by an exciting opening 2 rounds of the NCAA College Basketball tournament it was Cinderella in the form of Bear Stearns (BSC) that provided the market's initial spark.

Due to the backlash over its steal of a bid for Bear last weekend, JP Morgan (JPM) agreed to raise its bid from $2/share to $10/share. This made Bear's stock double in value, setting the firm at over $1Billion in valuation. Clearly JP Morgan realize it couldn't get away with its initial valuation as the oncoming Bear shareholder displeasure and potential lawsuits started gaining momentum.

Housing Sales rose in February giving the market further hope that the Fed interest rate action of the past months was indeed creating a bottom in the credit/housing market and that the US economy could turn itself around. This positive outlook propelled stocks even higher leading the Dow up 1.5%, the Nasdaq 3% and the S&P 1.5%.

As the market was led by Technology stocks today, it's important to note a major announcement that wasn't built as such. Google (GOOG), having lost the 700MHz spectrum auction to Verizon obviously had other backdoor plans of its own. All the speculation pointed to Google bidding to lose the spectrum just to see the Open Access guidelines pass, came to a major head today. Google announced that it had sent a letter to the FCC outlining its plans for using the White Space (spectrum between the analog TV channels currently not used) for broadband Internet access. What a score this would be for Google, having the ability to use Android phones on Verizon's expensive 700MHz network due to Open Access policies and then turning around and asking the FCC to look into its own devices that would use the White Space between the spectrum of analog TV channels. It'll be interesting to see how it plays out but Investors were clearly pleased with Google approach sending shares up over 6% to $460/share.

Disclosure: Author owns Google.

Bear Stearns Fall from Grace

The story that will makes the rounds of the Investment Banking Boardrooms, and business school curricula alike, will be that of the fall of Bear Stearns (BSC). The once proud up and comer on Wall Street is now being scooped up for $2/share by JP Morgan Chase (JPM).

Just to put things in perspective, Bear's all time high was last year's $159/share, giving it a market cap of over $18Billion. The stock closed today down 84%! at $4.80, giving it a market cap of $560Million. JP Morgan's buyout offer values the firm even less at just over $200Million.

A Staggering almost 99% loss in value from highs reached less than a year ago. A dramatic fall indeed! Bear made headlines at the end of last week when it took on more debt to keep itself liquid. JP Morgan and the New York Fed provided financing to the troubled Investment Bank, as the news incensed the Street dropping Bear by almost 40%. News broke of the buyout on the weekend and Bear Investors had no chance to get out prior to open this morning.

The company's heavy write-downs from the mortgage crisis have left it battered, bruised and now forced to take on more debt. All that was left was for JP Morgan to pick up the pieces at a substantial discount. Although not much is clear about the shape of Bear's books, they probably have never looked worse. The $200Million buyout by JP was a clear indication that Bear was more than likely headed to bankruptcy protection and the firm behind the Chase banking brand felt like there are valuable assets worth salvaging.

It'll be interesting to see how it all plays out, as Investors cheered the "buying bargains" strategy of JPM, sending shares up 10% today. I think JP Morgan will be paying for this one for many months to come, not only with the write-downs that are surely to follow Bear's funds from this quarter to the next, but also the string of shareholder lawsuits that will ultimately find their way to Class-Action status.

Disclosure: Author holds no position in BSC, JPM

2007 Ends with a Bearish Tone, Dow loses 100 points

The Dow ends the year down 101 points, and while the average is in positive return territory for the year (about 6.5%) the latter part of the year has become increasing volatile and negative. The credit crisis dominated the market headlines over the last few months and Big Finance has endured billions upon billions of losses in their asset valuations.

These bad bets have cost the big banks plenty as the hit list is broad and plentiful. Since Mid Year highs, there have been nothing but bad news from the Financial sector. (Apart from consistent blowout quarters at Goldman Sachs (GS))

• Citigroup (C) is down 48%
• Bank Of America (BAC) down 24%
• Wachovia (WB) down 34%
• Merrill Lynch (MER) down 46%
• JPMorgan Chase (JPM) down 19%
• Morgan Stanley (MS) down 31%
• Lehman Brothers (LEH) down 24%
• Bear Stearns (BSC) down 38%
• Goldman Sachs down 14%

These numbers are staggering and many analysts are painting an even bleaker picture for the Financials in 2008. While I think there's the potential for big rebound gains into the 2nd half of the year for these companies my major worry is that once Dividends start getting cut, more investors will flee to other safe havens. The rumors of Citigroup needing to cut its dividend by 40% certainly have hurt the stock over the past couple of weeks.

There will be opportunities in 2008 for the Investor, as I feel the recession fears are overblown and selling based on those fears is overdone. The selling was done consistently throughout the past couple months, timed with the Federal Reserve Interest rate moves.

2007 will go down as the year of the iPhone from Apple (AAPL), and the popular mobile phone gadget has helped the technology company to another breakout year by more that doubling since the device's unveiling. Look for Apple to extend its reach with iPhone in the coming months (Europe, Asia etc.). Technology and Oil were the leaders for better parts of the year in 2007 and this will likely continue going into 2008. I believe there is tremendous commodity and trader pressure to get and keep oil above the $100 mark. Should this happen it will continue to put pressure on the consumer and big ticket spending (Homes, Cars) will soften still, putting further pressure on the overall market and North American economy.

Luckily though, all metrics the market has gotten lately have pointed to a stable and growing US economy, and consumers seem to be taking high gas prices in stride. All signs point to a strong Christmas season, led broadly by Technology (Gaming & gadgets), and with this the chip makers should see continued strong demand, specifically Intel (INTC).

It's the first end of year trading session for the WC Power Tech Fund Blog and I'd like to thank all the readers throughout the first few months here.

Markets up Wednesday, Dow gains 99 led by General Motors

American Markets enjoyed another positive day with the Dow Jones finishing to the plus side by 99 points. The big push was provided by General Motors (GM) as it enjoyed a 9% gain. GM and the United Auto Workers Union reached a deal to renew auto worker contracts and restructure GM obligations to workers and the union. The threat of a long-term strike was lifted from the shoulders of GM and the stock jumped accordingly.

Also enjoying positive sentiment were the Investment Banks as Bear Stearns (BSC) jumped over 7% on reports that the big man himself, Warren Buffett is eyeing a stake in the company. These reports went on to say that several big banks are also interested in purchasing as much as 20% of the company. This news had investors feeling pretty good about the potential for these companies, specifically the investment banks, to overcome the losses and the mistakes that were made during the sub-prime credit situation.

In technology stocks, momentum for Research In Motion (RIMM) kept going strong as the company continues to defy gravity and bloated P/E valuations. The rule of 80-leads-to-100 was in full effect for the BlackBerry maker as it hit a high of $100.75 before settling to close at $99/share. Apple (AAPL) this morning opened to an all-time high and continued to $155 before drifting down and closing slightly lower just under $153. The recently opened Amazon (AMZN) DRM-Free MP3 store is making its rounds and while there hasn't been much of an effect on Apple's stock yet the consensus has been that this can emerge as a true competitor to iTunes.

With the quarter coming to a close investors will be keen to be placed in the right companies as the earnings season kicks into high gear.

Disclosure: Author is long AAPL

Goldman Rules the Street again, Earnings top Expectations

Goldman Sachs (GS), the biggest of the Investment Banks, reported earnings on the heels of a Lehman Brothers (LEH) beat and a Morgan Stanley (MS) fall, and did it ever show who rules Wall Street. Goldman reported earnings of $6.13/share versus the average estimate of $4.35 and a high estimate of $5.08. Now that's an earnings beat!

Goldman was all over the headlines during the sub-prime meltdown for its flagship Alpha Fund and its negative performance, but the trading giant turned around those losses and made a killing betting against mortgages. The results, net income of $2.85Billion, a 79% increase, revenue of $12.3Billion, a 63% increase, and the undoubted respect of Wall Street.

Bear Stearns (BSC) did not fare as well, seeing earnings slide 61% year over year. Morgan Stanley saw declines also. Goldman showcased its ability to react to trouble and create investment opportunities out of volatility and panic, particularly in this quarter. Shares have been rising since lows around $170 and shot up to $210 as the numbers were announced. However profit taking and general market trends dragged Goldman back down to $203.

I previously wrote a couple things about Goldman Sachs with the latest being an August 9th article (Link) regarding the Alpha Fund losses. Within this piece I weighed the negatives and the potential positives, stating that in fact I think Goldman Sachs had found a bottom. Additionally, I outlined that this earnings number would be crucial in sending GS in the right direction and I ended by suggesting that "the plan that Goldman has in motion should lead it to calmer seas well ahead"

As for those losses. Goldman did book about $1.7Billion in credit losses but more than made up for that in other trading and underwriting business. In fact equity trading revenue more than doubled to $3.1Billion. In asset-management, even though a couple big funds lost more than 20%, Goldman was able to compensate by increasing management fees by up to 40%. When you can increase your fees by almost half when you're doing poorly, you've got what's called Business Clout! Something that simply can not be challenged by every other Investment Bank on the street.

It appears that Goldman has found these calmer seas even quicker than I would have anticipated and now I don't think that all time highs during the holiday run up are out of the question. A company this effective at profiting from market turmoil, slowdown fears and general economic panic, is something worth owning. At around $200 it may just be a very handsome Christmas steal also.

Disclosure: Author is long GS

Consumer Confidence Slips, Market Tumbles from Uncertainty

A second straight day of falling economic metrics gives way to a second straight day of losses for the markets. Fresh off the heels of Monday's Housing report, in which housing sales fell to a 5 year low, came this morning's Consumer Confidence metrics. The Consumer Confidence Index fell from previous month high levels of 111 to around 105 and further economic fears clouded American Markets.

Federal Reserve minutes came out also and pulled markets down further as talk centralized on the possibility of the housing slump being more prolonged than initially thought. Investors took this sentiment from the Fed as a sign to head for the door leaving the Majors (Dow, Nasdaq and S&P) down across the board about 2%.

Will this mean that the Fed will need to provide the market with the needed September interest rate cut? Investors seem to be hoping that the rate cut will come and the markets will more than likely continue in this drifting pattern till the interest rate policy is known. The Financials led the sell off today as earnings estimates are being trimmed left and right for the Investment Banks and Major Financials. Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Bear Stearns (BSC) and Merrill Lynch (MER) all were sold off substantially today with Lehman Brothers (LEH) being the biggest victim of the selling. Citigroup (C), Bank of America (BAC) and Wachovia (WB) were also sold heavily showing that the dip in the financial sector was widespread.

The selling was broad across North American markets with all sectors seeing red. The Fed revealed that it had hoped the market would, in essence, fix itself but that clearly has not been the case. Now although the American economy is still in good shape, to create market stability here the Fed has really no choice but to interject again and produce an Interest Rate cut soon.

GS or MS: Battle Of The Banks

In the truest sense of the old-school type Battle of the Bands, where local Garage hopefuls filled stages to compete for the attention of, and possible employment from a single club or record label owner, I present a Battle of the Investment Banks.

With Bear Sterns (BSC) being the latest to fall like a 100 year old Redwood doing battle with the sub-prime market. Reports have surfaced over the last week that a couple big hedge funds inside the firm that were heavily invested in this industry are now virtually worthless. Does the investment banking investor have any hope out there?

Well, there are choices aplenty in this space such as Goldman Sachs (GS), Morgan Stanley (MS), Lehman Brothers (LEH) or Merrill Lynch (MER), along with several smaller firms all fighting for business and your investment dollar. Not to mention that the big brick-and-mortar banks are expanding heavily into the investment sector.

Taking the stage here and now surely wont be a local teenager with a new birthday present electric guitar, as we're looking at and comparing the cream of the crop in the investment banking world. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are the two biggest firms by market cap and for good reason, both companies are very good at what they do, and that's attract big clients, charge huge fees, and make money off every kind of investment imaginable. Have you ever heard of Weather Derivatives? It's where people in the marketplace can place bets on how many days it'll be higher or lower than the average temperature in a given month. You've never invested in something like this? Didn't think so, but guess what, these firms do!

So which one is better now and years from now? First to the stage Goldman Sachs. (Come on, you're telling me that wouldn't make a great band name)
The stock has fallen from a peak of $234 to $205 as it's been sideswiped, like everything else in the sector by this risky-mortgage mess. More often than not it is credited as being the best investment bank in the world and it sits with a trailing P/E of 9.5! A single digit P/E for a company that's earning and growing like Goldman Sachs. This rock star sports a healthy estimated Price to growth ratio of 0.7.

Goldman is so good at what it does but seemingly analysts are confounded at exactly what it does and how it goes about doing it. Yes Goldman has booked tremendous gains over the last year in some early Chinese investments but it's investing in these kinds of things all the time and people are surprised by the success. The nature of some of Goldman's trading operations make it seem like that part of the business is being run like one large hedge that can crash and burn on a bad bet or two but I think professionals that cover this company are missing the point. These are the smartest market people on the planet and they have backup plans that have backup plans. There's risk taking and then there's too much of a good thing, that's bound to crumble, just ask those Bear Sterns funds.

Goldman appears to be masterful at managing its internal risks but they have yet to fully be rewarded for it. The run up of the stock from the 150s to the 220s last year and early into this year should've only been the beginning however a wall was hit and the shares are tumbling back to the 200s. Opportunity? I think so!

Let's look at the other company. Morgan Stanley. If you thought Goldman's fundamentals were impressive how about Morgan sporting a P/E of 7.7 and a Price to growth of 0.6. Now Morgan Stanley notoriously went through step after step of cost-cutting and re-tinkering over the last 12 months in order to boost it's shareholder value and it seemed to have spark a turnaround in the business as well. But it also was hit hard falling from a high of 76 to it's current levels around $67/share. As far as businesses go, Morgan Stanley would seem more transparent to the average investor as they have clearly drawn lines for its business units and even are a player in the credit card world with their Discover brand. However, that has been an area of contention for the company as many feel selling that business unit would ultimately lead to more value long term and as such the company announced June 30th as the day it would in fact spin off the Discover business resulting in a $14/share payout to shareholders.

Is there an opportunity here also? Yes, however here is why I believe Goldman Sachs is the better play now and for the longer term.
Both companies brought in revenues of around $39Billion over the last year, however Goldman earned a Billion more ($10B v $9B). Goldman clearly is able to more efficiently turn a profit at a slightly higher margin rate. Here's the kicker though, Morgan Stanley employs 55,000 people, while only 30,000 work for Goldman Sachs.

Not only is Goldman earning more from the same amount of revenue, they are doing it almost half the personnel! So is it likely that in the years going forward Morgan Stanley is going to go through a massive layoff spree to bring it's personnel down so it can compete with Goldman in terms of profitability? No. What does seem more likely though, is that as both firms grow Goldman should have more room to expand and hence earn more money running it's top notch trading operations and hence have more opportunities to lure business away from other firms.

Both firms look prime for a rebound later in the year however I think you'll find Goldman's songs at the top of charts more consistently than Morgan's.

Disclosure: Author is long GS and holds no position in MS